Computer Language Shootout Scorecard

Back to the Win32 Shootout Back to dada's perl lab

Language Implementation Comparison Between Linux and Win32

Of course, only languages that are implemented in both platforms are included in the comparison. The results are based on CPU time only and the weights are the default ones used for the other scorecards. The delta bars represent the Win32 score in percentiles minus the Linux score in percentiles, so a positive value means a (relatively) better implementation on Win32, while a negative one means a (relatively) better implementation on Linux.

SCORES Language Implementation Score (Win32) Score (Linux) Delta Java java 710 703 +0.74 Pike pike 675 647 +2.95 C gcc 674 752 -8.21 Ocaml ocaml 665 751 -9.05 Lua lua 648 615 +3.48 Python python 648 578 +7.37 Ocaml ocamlb 630 718 -9.26 Forth gforth 595 637 -4.42 Perl perl 560 577 -1.79 Eiffel se 502 483 +2.00 Awk mawk 483 456 +2.84 SML smlnj 479 736 -27.05 Mercury mercury 475 489 -1.47 Tcl tcl 426 404 +2.32 Icon icon 422 349 +7.69 Scheme guile 418 396 +2.32 Awk gawk 391 314 +8.11 Haskell ghc 364 450 -9.05 Ruby ruby 356 546 -20.00 Erlang erlang 319 318 +0.11 PHP php 294 197 +10.21 Forth bigforth 239 376 -14.42 Languages that compile to native code are in Bold Italics.

---

Back to the Win32 Shootout Back to dada's perl lab

Send comments or suggestions to dada@perl.it